Monday, April 10, 2006

Reflections on the Team

It was halftime. The Stanford band was on the field, posing and goofing in their usual way and we were booing and screaming in ours. Then a Cal fan, bolder than the rest, began to climb the chain link fence that separated the fans from the field. We laughed as he evaded the security guards. We cheered as he swung over the top of the fence. We screamed as he hit the field and ran, flat out, towards the Stanford mascot, a ridiculous tree that bopped and weaved with no sense of style or rhythm. Every Cal fan in the world hated that tree. As he ran, we noticed he was carrying something in his hand. We couldn’t see it clearly but whatever it was, you knew it was going to be good. He was almost there now. A wild hysteria had burst across the crowd. He raised his hand and for the first time we saw what he was holding.

It was a baseball bat.

The cheer died in my throat. I watched, in shock, as he raised his bat and brought it down again and again. Who knows who was inside that costume? Boy, girl? Strong, frail? Maybe it was the sweetest kid at Stanford. The mascot was on the ground now and the Stanford band was trying to pull the assailant off as he struggled for one last swing. I turned to my fellow Cal fans, expecting to see the same shock and horror I knew was on my face. They were still cheering. My brothers in blue and gold, the strangers I had felt so close to a moment before, were actually cheering.

I’m not making this up. This really happened.

At some point in life we choose sides. We pick our allegiances like options on a car or dishes at a restaurant. There is no limit to the number of teams you can join. I am a man, a Jew, an American, a Cal Fan, etc. Pick a team and suddenly, you are connected with hundreds, thousands or even millions of people and they are connected to you. You belong. It’s a powerful feeling. When soldiers in the field are asked what is really motivating them to risk their lives, the answer isn’t usually country or ideals, it’s the guy in the trench next to him. It’s the unit, the platoon, and the team.

And of course, our teams are special. They are “The Chosen People”, imbued with manifest destiny and blessed by God. (One is forced to speculate, however, on the value of God’s blessing when, if you listen to us, he bestows it on Christians, Jews, Muslims and both teams before the super bowl.) Joining a team makes us part of something special. The problem is, the moment you define what you are, you also define what you are not.

Racism, Sexism, Anti-Semitism, Homophobia and a thousand other examples of man’s inhumanity to man are inextricably tied to our allegiances and associations. After all, it is a basic human imperative to look out for your own first and everyone else second. In fact, the presence of an opposition can be a very strong motivator. Hitler united a broken and defeated German people by manufacturing an enemy out of the Jews. Ethnic cleansing in Bosnia or Rwanda, have at their heart the certain knowledge that one group is good and the other evil, and that for one to survive the other must be destroyed.


So, where does it come from, this need to divide up the world into us and them, right and wrong, friend and foe?

I used to believe that we did this because it was the only way we could comprehend the world around us. Our minds simply can’t contemplate, trillions of stars or billions of years, or even millions of people. There are almost six billion people on this planet, each with their own, history, aspirations, fears, and loves but to think of every individual is beyond our capability. We can think of India, but not every Indian. We can think of Christianity but not each Christian. And so we divide up the world, making decisions along the way about the character of each of our divisions and since everyone is doing this, a world of allegiances is formed.

But I have come to believe that there is another reason, a deeper reason. A need, which emerges from the moment of our birth and haunts many of us until the day we die.

It’s not just that we don’t know the world. It’s that we don’t know ourselves. We are looking for more than a team. We are looking for a reflection. After all, how can you know who you are without a mirror?

When you are born, you know almost nothing about the world and you look to your surroundings, your parents, siblings and friends to define who you will become. Without even realizing it you adopt a thousand details of behavior, how to eat, walk, speak, humor, manners, tastes, God. We are sponges for behavior, constantly adopting and adapting new modes of speech, dress, and action. Most of us don’t walk about with a constant identity, an ideal self that never changes from situation to situation. We are, in fact, constantly shifting, blending in with current circumstances.

So, who are we really? What is the truth hiding beneath the shifting fog of our artifice? Maybe we don’t know. Maybe we can never really know. And so we reach out to our reflections in the world, those others of our perceived kind, and we know our identity through them. I am a man, a Jew, an American, a Cal Fan. I know how to dress, speak, act properly within those groups and when Cal wins, I win and when the Jews loose, I loose. Attack my team and you attack me.

But it is important to remember that all of us are, for the most part, the product of our circumstances. We have all adapted to the world we find ourselves in. The odds are, had we been born in Nazi Germany, Stalin’s Russia, or the Taliban’s Afghanistan, we would not have fought against the conception of the world that we were presented with. We would have lived, worshiped, fought and hated along with everyone else. There are occasionally exceptional people who rise above their surroundings and fight against the common will, but those people appear far to infrequently and they rarely survive for long.

This “us and them” view of the world seems so natural we hardly ever think to question it, but question it we must.

The world today teeters on the brink of a culture war. Each day we hear of another death, another bomb, another tragedy. Each day our world seems to shrink and hope disintegrates into the mist.

So, as we stare at the stranger on the other side of field, the enemy whose very existence is a threat to ours, we must remember that he too is simply a reflection of his environment. He is a human being, just like us, struggling to find his way through a difficult world. We might not understand his motivations but he does have them. Christians and Muslims. Rich and Poor. Black and White. Republican and Democrat. The truth is they have far more in common than we care to admit.

Maybe if we can learn to focus on our similarities rather than our differences we can find our way onto a much greater team. And if there is God, and if he were to single out one team for his blessing, let us hope it would be this one.

The human race.

Because the truth is, we are all members whether we like it or not. All the other teams are just the illusions of our limited imaginations.

So, when I am filled with anger at the player on the other side. I try to remember that halftime, so long ago, when I watched one of my brothers attack one of theirs and all I can think is, “that could have been me, dressed in that ridiculous costume that day”. After all, I applied to Stanford. I just didn’t get in.

5 Comments:

Blogger Steve said...

Sometimes I think that's the only reasonable conclusion.

8:48 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Another awesome blog.

I think I'm amazed at how none of us are particularly interested in seeing our reflections.

Lots of food for thought!!

10:01 AM  
Blogger Steve said...

You bring up a really interesting point. To be honest, I wasn't really giving much thought to "bat guy" It was the Cal fans that were cheering him on that offended me. They were so blinded by their allegiances that they failed to see the obscenity of his actions.

So, I agree. "Bat Guy" should be severely dealt with. Behaivor like that should not be tolerated.

But to be honest, I do take issue with some of the things you said. You asked if it was just as bad to choose, "an eye for an eye" The problem I have with that phrase is that it is always taken out of context. The bible says "no more than an eye for an eye" it isn't a requirement for punnishment but rahter a limitation on punnishemnt.

You said, "the 'bat guy' would be as good as dead" . As bad as beating up a defenselss tree is, it is not murder (as far as we know) Demanding death is much more than an eye for an eye.

You said, "Hurt one of my own and see the price you pay". It's the "one of my own", that I am trying to fight against.

Why should my desire for justice depend on my relationship to the victim? Why should I be more enraged by the death of an American than the death of an Iraqi?

What punnishment would you have asked for if you were Bat Guy's father? Would you demand an eye for an eye? Or would you have begged for mercy.

There is a reason that the figure of justice on top of the Supreme Court building is blind.

4:17 PM  
Blogger Steve said...

Another great post.

The truth is I have a very selfish kind of philosophy. It's all about me.

I might not be able to stop bat guy from acting like an ass but I can stop myself from becoming bat guy. I can't single handedly make the world a better place but I can strive to make myself a better person.

Sometimes the moral path in life is overgrown and difficult to see. Sometimes we think we're walking an upright road, only to discover that we have taken a wrong turn.

The best thing we can do is keep our eyes open and be willing to admit when we're lost.

Sometimes we have to fight, but when we do we must do everything in our power to make sure it is a just cause and that there was no alternative to violence.

We are the teachers of the world around us. If we respond to the world with compassion, honesty and a sense of social justice, then we make it more likely that people will to respond to us in the same way.

Newton said that to every action there was an equal and opposite reaction. This applies, I believe, not just to physics but to the dynamics of human interaction. Treat me with violence and you greatly increase the odds of my responding in kind. In fact, I would be foolish not to. Treat me with compassion and maybe, just maybe, I will pass that compassion on and the world will begin to change.

That might be a fools hope, but even a fools hope is better than no hope at all.

5:03 PM  
Blogger Steve said...

Man, this is turning into an interesting discussion. So, naturally I have to respond with a very, very long post.

I think this is one of the most important questions we have to ask ourselves. What is the point of punishment?

There are several possible answers. The ones that occur to me are revenge, training, deterrent, rehabilitation, or, simply, removing the evil person from society. There are probably others.

I think that whatever we define as our system should have the societies best interests at heart. What we are trying to do is to reduce bad behavior or crimes in our society. Any system that helps us to do that should be kept, any system which fails to do that should be rethought.

To me, this throws revenge right out. Revenge and justice don't go along. If you kill my kid, then, I must have revenge and kill you (or to be perfectly fair I should kill your kid) Then you have to attack me and it goes on. This is particularly bad when you are dealing in large groups with both sides taking their revenge on new innocents. This is how you get to the Israelis and the Palestinians. Two sides locked in a perpetual state of vengeance. Both completely convinced that they are right. Revenge has nothing to do with social justice. If you create a system based on balancing out the pain, all you end up with is a society in which everybody hurts.

Training is what we experienced when we were kids. Our parents approved of us when we behaved properly and disapproved when we didn’t. I’m not talking about big punishments necessarily. Maybe it was just strong words or negative looks. Most of this training has become so instinctual we don’t even notice it any more. We don’t use our fork properly or say excuse me because we are actively concerned about punishment. We do it because we were trained to behave that way.

Deterrent. This is also a form of training. You don’t behave badly because you know that something bad will happen to you. I want that car, those drugs, to drive fast, to kill but I am unwilling to deal with the consequences of those actions, ie. Jail time. This is theoretically reinforced when you experience the punishment first hand. In other words, prison should be so terrible that you would never do anything to risk going back there. Our system is based very strongly on this idea.

Unfortunately, so far it doesn’t work very well. First of all, studies have shown that higher penalties have not significantly impacted crime rates. Knowing that your drug deal will now cost you 20 years instead of 10 has little or no effect on the people dealing drugs. Secondly, our over crowded, undefended prisons are training grounds for criminality. Frequently petty criminals go into prison with serious criminals and find that the only way to survive in that society is to become more violent and dishonest rather than less. They take these lessons back on the street and commit more crimes. In fact, after a few years in prison, many ex-convicts find that the only society they are now fit to interact with is the criminal one, hence, the high levels of recidivism in this country.

Which leads us to the idea of rehabilitation. Is it possible to change a criminal into a law abiding citizen? I think theoretically, this is the ideal solution but it is very difficult to implement. First of all it’s expensive and labor intensive. It means providing training, counseling and opportunities to a community which society has already determined is undesirable. Why should we waste our time and money on these guys when we can’t fund our schools and our environment is collapsing? To me, however, you have to offer these guys something or your better off never letting them out at all. If you don’t give them the tools to live a law-abiding life you are pretty much guaranteeing that they will commit further crimes.

Which brings us to the one black and white option, “Get the criminals off the street”. If your only punishments are the death penalty and life imprisonment you guarantee that those guys will never bother any one again. At least they wont bother anyone outside the prison. It might not be fair. It might not be cheap but it is effective.

But I think a society with a severe and unfair criminal justice system is in big trouble. It does well for the serious professional criminals, but it does very poorly for the first offenders, accidental offenders and the ones on the fence, plus it breeds a culture of fear and secrecy.

So, my feeling is a combination of training, deterrent and rehabilitation is the best bet. Have strong punishments that fit the crime but make a serious effort to create opportunities for the prisoners when they are let back on the street.

However, I think the most important thing we can do is sort of beyond the scope of the question and that’s work to eliminate the causes of crime, poverty, lack of education and despair. But that’s a whole other blog.

1:27 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home