The Worst Kind of Criminal

There is a certain class of criminals we hate above all others, a certain kind of deviant that we, as society, have always united to destroy.

It isn’t enough to decry them in public or mock them in private. It isn’t enough to imprison. It isn’t enough to torture or even kill them. They must be stamped out, eliminated, lest their ideas fester and spread.

No other group, not drug traffickers, sweat shop owners or even war criminals have been so consistently and tenaciously persecuted.

And yet no matter how many of them we threaten or imprison, no matter how many of their lives we destroy, no matter how many of them we kill, whether by assassin’s bullet or state sponsored execution, their ideas, like some malicious form of cancer, keep coming back to haunt us.

Who are these villains that seem to frighten us so much?

They are the lovers of peace, tolerance, forgiveness and compassion. They are the heroes of our highest ideals and they are the ones we, as a society, have united, over and over again, to destroy.

You don’t believe me? Compare the death of Jesus, Gandhi and Martin Luther King to those of Stalin, Mau or even Hitler.

Read the transcripts of the Nuremberg trial and see how carefully the charge of “War Criminal” is prosecuted and how relatively merciful the sentences. Then compare those trials and sentences to those of Nelson Mandela, Steven Biko, Lech Walesa or thousands of other peacemakers throughout history.

You might say that miscarriages of justice like that only occur under evil regimes like Soviet Dominated Poland or South Africa under apartheid but, to do so you would have to ignore HUAC under McCarthy, Nixon’s “enemies list”, the treatment of civil rights activists in the South and literally dozens of other miscarriages of American justice.

Most people when asked about things like peace, compassion, freedom and justice would say that they are for them. Just as most people decry war, poverty, and injustice on principle.

However, in reality, it often works out to be just the opposite.

It is those who march for peace who must face the fire-hoses. It is those who refuse, on principal, to kill that are labeled traitors and imprisoned. While those who fight for the poor are called communists or worse, “Community organizer”.

What does it say about a nation when rallies are held to save the taxes of a billionaire while millions fall below the poverty line?

What does it say about a nation that defends their right to wage pre-emptive war, while ignoring the battle scarred veterans who fought that war?

What does it say about a planet where men of peace like Martin Luther King, Jesus, and Gandhi and hundreds of other peace makers die violently or in prison, while dictators like the Shah of Iran, Fernando Marcos and Pol Pot die of natural causes?

How is it possible that a church, founded on the life of a peaceful man who was tortured to death could, in turn, torture non-believers and go to war in his name?

How is it possible for Gandhi to unite a nation through non-violence then watch that same nation fall apart in racial slaughter before being assassinated himself?

What does it say when the values that most of the world’s population hold dear, compassion, peace and forgiveness are constantly under siege while greed, aggression and vengeance are defended as if they were virtues?

It says that there is a great chasm in the human heart between what we claim to believe and the real motivations which drive us.

We might decry aggression, violence and revenge but we are still inexplicably drawn to them.

Turn on the TV, watch a movie or play a video game and the odds are you will see some form of violence. We romanticize violent struggle over just about everything else and our great heroes whether real or fictional are often people of violence.

Alexander, Caesar, Napoleon, Genghis Khan.

There is no question that these were great men. Great in the sense that they literally changed the face of history.

But they were also conquerors, killers, men who repeatedly chose war over peace.

They were great, but that did not make them good.

The good people, the ones who stood up against the conquerors, the ones who fought for peace were probably called traitors and their names have been lost in the mists of history while the characters of those who conquered have been whitewashed by time and elevated to the status of heroes.

Like millions of others, I have spent much of my life fascinated by the martial arts and there are tens of thousands of martial arts schools around the world to teach me martial ways.

Where are the schools for the peaceful arts?

Most of us understand that a world in which all the resources are controlled by a tiny minority, while the vast majority descends further and further into poverty is not only an unjust world but an unstable one and yet that is the world that we live in.

To make matters worse, those champions of greed are canonized in our libraries and magazines. We admire their private jets and opulent mansions. Where are the stories about those who work hard and live simply? If we idolized frugality and charity instead of extravagance and selfishness, our world would be a much better place.

Most of us believe that racism, and intolerance are wrong but we cannot help dividing ourselves into groups, teams, nations and religions and for some reason, all of us feel that the team we are on is the “good guys”.

If our world is to survive, all of this must change. We have become far too powerful to endure much longer the discrepancy between what we claim to believe and how we actually live our lives.

It is, in fact, time to side with the great criminals of history, with Gandhi, and Jesus and Martin Luther King.

It is time to put down the sword and become a criminal, a deviant...

A peacemaker.

On the Power of Faith

Those of you who know me, or have read my blog, know that I am not a religious person. Logic, consistency, objectivity and provability are the standards by which I try (albeit at times unsuccessfully) to live my life. Those standards, are frequently at odds with those of religion, which value faith above all other things.

This predilection for the scientific perspective has naturally led me into one heated discussion after another with my more religious friends. These discussions invariably end badly, with me disappointed in my friend/opponent’s inability to see the inconsistencies in their faith while they are equally frustrated and sometimes angry with, what they see as, my patronizing attitude towards their most, cherished beliefs.

So, rather than once again reviewing my litany of Biblical inconsistencies, mocking the biography of Joseph Smith, or trying to explain the criteria for scientific proof, I have decided to examine the question of faith from a decidedly different angle.

Let us first stipulate that although it is possible (albeit, in my opinion very unlikely) for one, particular religion to be literally true, it is impossible for all religions to be literally true.

If the tenants of Hinduism are correct about reincarnation then Judaism must be false in it’s belief in only one life on earth . If, as the Jews believe, the Messiah has not yet appeared, then Christianity must be false as it is based on the divinity of Jesus. If Jesus was, as the Christians believe, the last great prophet, then the followers of Mohammed must be following a fraud.

If one is true, the others must be false. Consequently, since none of the religions of the world represent a majority of the religious population, it follows that the vast majority of religious people on the planet believe in a doctrine which is not true.

However, the fact that most religious people on the planet must be wrong does not effect the intensity of their faith.

The question is, “Is it possible that something which is not literally true can have real and transformative value?”

Here’s a story.

A Jew, a Muslim, a Christian and a Buddhist walk into an AA meeting. All four men have struggled with alcoholism for many years. All four men have tried, over and over again, to fight their addiction with will power and all have failed. All four men begin the twelve step program by admitting they are powerless over their alcoholism. All four men turn their problem over to a higher power. All four men define that higher power differently. Yet, all four manage to do something they have never been able to do on their own.

They stop drinking.

And who gets the credit for this transformation? God? Buddha? Allah? Jesus? If Jesus helped the Christian quit drinking who helped the Buddhist? Who helped the Jew? They cannot all exist and yet all four men found help.

So, what gave these men the power to do what they couldn’t do on their own?

Faith did. Not truth. Not God. Faith.

The Placebo Effect

The placebo effect is really a study in the power of the human mind, or, depending on how you look at it, the power of bullshit. Tell a patient that the sugar pill they are ingesting is a cure and you vastly increase the chances that they will recover. This isn’t psudo-science or new age mysticism. This is carefully documented scientific fact. Our health is intimately linked to our state of mind.

The placebo effect can work in the opposite way as well. In a recent study, the arms of a group of students were rubbed by a plant which they were told was poison ivy. 80% of those students developed rashes consistent with that plant’s effect, despite the fact that the plant they touched wasn’t poison Ivy at all.

Since scientists are seeking real drugs and techniques which can consistently combat disease, they spend most of their time trying to eliminate the placebo effect from their research. Consequently, we think of placebo’s as a statistical anomaly or an experimental nuisance. However, I think that is a mistake.

These results are not inconsequential. They are substantiated and significant. I do not believe that our perceptions and beliefs can magically change the world around us (as we have been told by self help books like The Secret) However, there is no doubt that our beliefs can have powerful, transformative effects on ourselves and by transforming ourselves we do change both our perceptions of the world and how we act in it.

If faith in a tiny pill can cure disease, how much more powerful is faith in an omnipotent and loving God?

So, let us return to our AA members and examine, once again, how they managed their recovery. They knew that they could not beat their drinking on their own. They put their faith in a cure and the cure worked despite the fact that, for at least three out of four of them, the cure must not exist.

Is it possible that something which is not literally true can have real substantial value?

The answer is yes.

Here is a description of a religion.

You go with your family and community into a beautiful space. You perform rituals which are probably not all that different from what your great grand parents performed. You sing, read, and pray in unison. You listen to the wise words of elders. You meditate and contemplate your own life. You ask forgiveness for your inequities. You fast. You dance. You celebrate together and you mourn together. You lend your strength to the rest of the community when you can and take strength from the community when you need to. You have faith in a meaning and a power beyond this world.

The question is, which religion did I just describe? The answer: Pretty much all of them.

So, what do we conclude from this? That the major religions are nothing but plagiarists, callously stealing ideas from each other, or is it possible that the stuff religions do, fasting, singing, praying, is simply good stuff, regardless of whether the doctrine it is designed to support is true?

Almost every religion has the story of the wise man, Christian monk, Hindu ascetic, aboriginal Holy Man or Zen master, who turns his back on society and goes into the wilderness where, through a process of fasting, self denial, meditation, or even drug induced hallucination, has a transformative experience.

Again, what do we conclude from this. Do we see the transformative experience as evidence that the particular mythology the holy man subscribed to is true despite the fact, that that mythology is in direct contradiction to the holy men of other sects who had similar experiences or do we instead conclude that putting the mind and body through a profound change, fasting, deprivation, silence, torture, etc...can be transformative with or without any mythology at all?

The truth is that if you put the human body and mind in an extreme situation, whether it is fasting on your Yoga retreat or going through basic training in the marine corps something will happen, something profound.

Malcolm X and Nelson Mandela had their transformative experiences in prison.

So what do we tell our four AA members who’s faith saved their lives? What do we tell the billions of people across the globe who gain solace, hope and a sense of belonging from their religious traditions. What do we tell the men and women who have had a religious experience so profound that it has not only transformed their lives but, from their perspective, the entire world?

Do we tell them that these experiences are nothing more than dramatic examples of the placebo effect? Do we explain that songs, architecture and ritual do not prove the existence of God? Do we belittle the most important experience of their lives by explaining it?

Can you imagine how insulting that would sound?

Faith is real. Faith is powerful. Faith helped Gandhi and Martin Luther King stand up against impossible odds. Faith helped Jesus forgive his murderers. Faith might even have helped your team win the super bowl.

The truth is that all of the elements of religion; community, tradition, music, mediation, art, prayer, the personal spiritual journey, and yes even faith, can be positive and valuable additions to a person’s or community's life. The problem arises when that genuine value is seen as absolute proof that the particular doctrine they believe in must be true.

And that is very, very dangerous.

Faith exists beyond rational thought and is therefor easily manipulated and very difficult to argue with.

Our four AA men’s lives were literally saved by their faith, so how can they argue when their faith calls upon them to persecute homosexuals, burn down abortion clinics, or raise the shout of global Jihad against all the infidels who oppose the god that saved their life.

Faith has spilt it’s share of blood and the only hope we have is that we find a way to mediate the power of our faith with the power of reason.

In my opinion, the myths of Samson and Jonah are just as likely as the myths of Hercules and Loki or, for that matter, Superman and Spiderman.

However, I will acknowledge that your belief in those stories and your participation in the rituals that go along with them can have lasting and positive effects on your life and that of your community.

All I ask in return is that you acknowledge that believing in a thing beyond reason, beyond logic, can be as dangerous and destructive as it is beneficial.

I support your right to choose faith but I hope that it will be faith tempered by reason and compassion, a faith which is at once humble and forgiving, self-critical and patient.

In short, if your faith helps you strive to be a better person, then we have nothing to argue about.